Want to make almost the same power as a Hellcat in your Ford Mustang? Ford has you covered with a new Roush supercharger for the 5.0-liter V-8. The kit, available through Ford Performance, fits either the 2018 Mustang GT or the V-8-powered 2018 F-150. Better yet, the supercharger does not void the engine’s warranty and the kit comes with its own warranty when installed by Ford.

The Roush supercharger kit is designed to work with the 5.0’s new port and direct injection fuel system and is rated at 700 hp and 610 lb-ft of torque for the Mustang GT and 640 hp and 600 lb-ft for the F-150. That is with 93 octane and 12 psi of boost. On the Mustang, the kit can be installed on either the 10-speed automatic or six-speed manual transmission.

“Our teams collaborated to create the most highly engineered, tested and performing supercharger kit on the market,” said Jack Roush, chairman of the board of directors at Roush Performance, in a release. “The combination of the 2018 5.0-liter engine and our all-new, fully integrated 2650 supercharger system yields simply incredible, no-compromise performance.”

From the factory, the 5.0-liter V-8 in the Mustang GT produces 460 hp and 420 lb-ft. The kit adds to that an impressive 240 hp and 190 lb-ft of torque. The 5.0 in the F-150produces 395 hp and 400 lb-ft from the factory, and pumps out an additional 245 hp and 200 lb-ft with the supercharger installed.

The Roush supercharger kit includes all the required installation hardware and an exclusive performance calibration. Expect to see the kit available in early 2018 at Ford dealers, Ford Performance Warehouse Distributors, and Roush dealers. For additional information you can visit Ford Performance Parts.

This is not the first supercharger kit developed by Roush for Ford’s 5.0-liter V-8. In 2015, we saw a Roush Stage 3 supercharger kit developing 670 hp and 545 lb-ft and in 2014 asupercharger kit was said to produce more than 600 hp.


Chevrolet Truck’s centennial celebration might end with a full-size bang. Not long after Chevrolet starts its second century of building trucks, the next-generation Silverado will make its debut. Likely arriving for the 2019 model year, the next Silverado will up its game in performance and capability after a generation that never really wowed us. During 2014 Truck of the Year testing, we said the then-new model only caught up to the competition in some ways but didn’t even do that in other ways.

Chevrolet’s midsize Colorado has twice earned our Truck of the Year calipers, and if you’re as curious as we are about the 2019 Silverado, keep reading for our best guesses (the outgoing Silverado is pictured below).

Not a Hard Decision

The 2019 Chevrolet Silverado will stick with a steel body, giving it an advantage for traditionalists not convinced by Ford’s expensive decision to build the F-150 with weight-reducing aluminum. Adding aluminum to development would have increased cost, diverting money that otherwise could be invested back in updated powertrains.

10 for All?

Speaking of updated powertrains, don’t be surprised to see Chevrolet use a 10-speed automatic transmission for V-6 and V-8 gas-powered engine options. Currently, the 2018 Silverado’s 4.3-liter V-6 produces 285 hp and 305 lb-ft of torque—that’s more torque than the Ram 1500 and Ford F-150 but less horsepower than those two rivals. That engine or the more volume-oriented 5.3-liter V-8 might get downsized and add turbochargers, but the 6.2-liter V-8 should continue, giving Chevrolet a powertrain option with well over 400 hp.

A mild hybrid model is likely to make its return on the next-gen Silverado (yes, the eAssist model still exists), but Silverado customers looking for the best marriage of efficiency with capability might be more interested in …

The Diesel

Ford has confirmed a diesel-powered F-150 is on the way, and at Motor Trend, we’ve been impressed by the diesel on the Ram 1500, which was our 2013 and 2014 Truck of the Year. Chevrolet has been introducing diesels across its lineup, adding a 2.8-liter unit on the Colorado, and debuting diesel variants of the Cruze sedan and Equinox crossover. A Silverado diesel for the 2019 or 2020 model year is a real possibility.

But Will it Look Like a Camaro?

In a segment as important to Chevrolet as the full-size truck, the Silverado’s visual updates will clearly establish the 2019 model as new but maintain the current model’s boxy appeal. The split headlight design detail should return, complemented by a more modern LED daytime running light treatment. Those LED daytime running lights, by the way, could be paired with HID headlights on base models—already standard on every 2018 Silverado—or D-Optic LED headlights on higher trims (the feature made its debut on the 2018 Traverse). Updated headlights might improve the current Silverado’s IIHS headlight rating of Poor; the Ram 1500’s ratings go up to Marginal (one rating higher), and the 2018 F-150 also gets a Poor rating.

Ready to Haul

Ford increased the maximum towing capacity on the 2018 F-150 to 13,200 pounds, and the 2018 Silverado already maxes out at an impressive 12,500 pounds. Putting aside the omnipresent battle for top-towing bragging rights, we hope most engine/cab configurations on the 2019 Silverado get a little boost, too.

Rebel, Raptor, and …

Chevrolet offers the Z71 package for those who want more off-road capability than a standard four-wheel-drive system can provide, but the automaker might prepare an even more capable, halo-worthy Silverado model in the next couple years. Ram has the Rebel and Ford the Raptor; with the Colorado ZR2 leading Chevy’s charge in the midsize segment, could a full-size off-road offering be far behind?

Higher Country

When Chevrolet introduced the high-end Silverado High Country model, the automaker originally told us it was trying to fill the space between LTZ and the GMC Sierra Denali trim (a pre-refresh 2014 model is shown here). For the new Silverado, we’re curious to see if that will remain the strategy. Ford already offers three F-150 trims with base prices above $50,000, with the Limited cresting $60,000. Along with general improvements to the Silverado’s overall level of refinement, we expect Chevrolet’s luxury trim—or trims—to reach higher.

The new Silverado could offer a 360-degree multicamera system on higher trims, as well as the automaker’s rear camera mirror.

The outgoing Silverado hasn’t exactly been a Motor Trend favorite, placing third in a 2014 comparison against a Ram 1500 and Ford F-150. Even so, as Chevrolet celebrates an entire century of building trucks, we’re eager to see what the automaker has planned for the 2019 Silverado.


There are two kinds of car buyers: those who drive a car off a dealer lot and are content to leave it that way for the rest of its life and those that have the itch to tinker, personalize, and accessorize. Perhaps better than any other automaker, BMW knows how to appeal to this second type of buyer and tap into their wallet with its line of M Performance Parts. And although some of the parts in the catalog are purely cosmetic, many do actually deliver on the “performance” part of the brand name.

To find out just how much of an improvement you’ll see with BMW’s latest M Performance Parts, we took delivery of an Austin Yellow Metallic 2017 BMW M3equipped with the Competition Package and a long list of dealer-installed upgrades. Like all M3s and M4s with the competition pack, this car makes an additional 19 hp from its twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-six, bringing output to 444 hp and 406 lb-ft of torque. The competition package also includes a retuned stability control system, Active M differential, and new springs, dampers, and anti-roll bars for the Adaptive M suspension.

But our car came with an even more extreme M Performance suspension ($1,480), which gets you height-adjustable coilover springs that use the existing shocks and can lower the car up to 20 mm (0.8 inch). Other big-ticket items include an M Performance titanium exhaust system ($4,400) and lightweight wheel and summer tire package ($5,495).

The wheel and tire package includes a staggered set of 19-inch front and 20-inch rear split-spoke alloy wheels wrapped in super-sticky Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires. The titanium exhaust might add some power, but BMW doesn’t specify how much. The automaker says you will save 17 pounds compared to the standard exhaust, however. Whether it makes any more power, the system sounds great at wide-open throttle, though it tends to drone on the highway.

The tires and suspension shined in testing, especially on the figure eight where the modified M3 shaved 0.8 second off the time of a standard M3 Competition Pack. Road test editor Chris Walton noted how flat the car remained on the course and liked the grip of the upgraded rubber. “I was impressed with how well this M3 put the power down, and much of it must be owed to the Cup tires,” he said. The modified M3 also held 1.06 g on the skidpad, greater than an M3 with just the Competition Package (0.98 g) and our old long-term 2015 M3 (0.99 g). Both cars rode on Michelin Pilot Super Sport max performance summer tires versus the modified M3’s DOT-approved competition tires, which are streetable but not recommended in wet conditions. The M Performance Parts-enhanced M3 was also quicker on the dragstrip than the last Competition Pack M3 we tested, hitting 60 mph in 3.8 seconds (versus 4.3 seconds) and completing the quarter mile in 12.1 seconds at 118.7 mph (versus 12.5 seconds at 118 mph). Braking from 60-0 mph was nearly identical at 101 feet.

Given how good this M3 was on the track, it should come as no surprise it was also good on one of my favorite canyon roads. There, the M3 turned in crisply and just stuck in corners with no hint of understeer or oversteer. In testing, the car felt neutral to a point, with a tendency toward oversteer when pushed. But on real roads at a somewhat spirited pace, the chassis and tires complement each other to produce a car that feels well balanced and supremely nimble. The steering feels artificially weighted but accurate, and the wheel is on the meaty side but fits great in the hands, thanks to grippy yet teddy-bear soft Alcantara. The carbon-ceramic brakes offered excellent bite and didn’t fade even through a long string of downhill curves. The seven-speed dual-clutch transmission shifts precisely when you ask it to, and the paddles are long and easy to reach when you’re shuffling your hands on the steering wheel.

But unless this is your weekend canyon carver or track car, odds are you’ll have to live with it in the city, too—and in that environment it’s not nearly as fun to drive. Judging by the fender gaps, our car looked to be dropped to the coilovers’ lowest setting. On top of that, our tester came equipped with the $2,640 carbon-fiber front lip. The lip makes the front end look sporty and expensive, showing off lots of exposed carbon fiber, but front clearance is minimal. Nearly every driveway has to be taken at an angle, and even then you still might scrape if you’re not careful. Height is manually adjustable at the spring perch, so you might want to raise the car if you know you’re going into town or only lower the car when you’re going to the track. You also don’t have to spring for the carbon-fiber lip if you’re worried about scraping. But if you want the look and claimed aero benefits of the lip without the risk of damaging precious carbon fiber, BMW will sell you a matte black plastic unit for $470.

Our tester came loaded with virtually every accessory in the M Performance Parts catalog, which ballooned the MSRP to a staggering $113,715. Yes, that’s a lot more than the 2017 M3’s $64,995 starting price, but that’s only if you order everything on the menu. We specced a 2018 M3 with the dual-clutch transmission, Competition Package, M Performance Suspension, and the lightweight wheels and Pilot Sport Cup 2 tires for $81,120—and you can always add parts as you go. But if money is no object, then don’t let $337-a-piece exhaust tip finishers stop you from living your carbon-fiber dreams.

Of course, BMW isn’t the only game in town when it comes to performance parts. Aftermarket suspension companies such as Bilstein, KW, Öhlins, and many others offer coilover kits for the M3 and M4, and there are countless companies that make wheels and exhaust systems out there. But one benefit of the M Performance coilovers is that, because factory shocks are used, damping can still be adjusted from inside the car if you have the adaptive suspension. And if you have M Performance Parts installed at the dealer, your car’s warranty won’t be affected.

The BMW M Performance Parts catalog has something for everyone. If you simply want a high-performance look, BMW has plenty of decals and carbon fiber and aluminum accessories emblazoned with the M logo. If you want actual performance with measurable gains, your local BMW dealer has that, too.

2017 BMW M3 (Competition Package w/M Performance Parts)
BASE PRICE $64,995
VEHICLE LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD, 5-pass, 4-door sedan
ENGINE 3.0L/444-hp/406-lb-ft twin-turbo DOHC 24-valve I-6
TRANSMISSION 7-speed twin-clutch auto
CURB WEIGHT (F/R DIST) 3,633 lb (53/47%)
WHEELBASE 110.7 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 184.5 x 73.9 x 56.3 in
0-60 MPH 3.8 sec
QUARTER MILE 12.1 sec @ 118.7 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 101 ft
MT FIGURE EIGHT 23.4 sec @ 0.86 g (avg)
ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 198/140 kW-hrs/100 miles
CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB 0.99 lb/mile

GM: Cars a drag in 2.2% skid

DETROIT — Solid increases in sales of crossovers and pickups weren’t enough to offset a significant decline in car sales for General Motors in October.

The automaker on Wednesday reported a 2.2 percent decrease to 252,813 vehicles sold last month compared with a year ago. That includes crossovers up 8.3 percent, pickups increasing 8.6 percent and cars dropping 20 percent. Year to date, sales fell 0.9 percent to 2.4 million vehicles.

GM’s crossover sales of 78,957 crossovers for the month were driven by record October sales for five nameplates: the Chevrolet Equinox and Traverse, Buick Encore and Enclave, and GMC Acadia.

Brands: GMC up 4.6%, Cadillac down 0.1%, Chevy down 3.8%, Buick down 4.5%

Notable nameplates: Chevy Silverado up 6.8%, GMC Sierra up 26%, Chevy Equinox up 29%, Buick Encore up 25%, Chevy Cruze down 35%, Chevy Volt down 38%, Chevy Corvette down 49%, Chevy Sonic down 66%, Chevy Bolt 2,781 units (highest since launch in December).

Incentives: $5,105, up 15% from a year earlier, according to ALG.

Average transaction price: $36,865per vehicle, up 0.1% from a year earlier, according to ALG.

Fleet mix: 23.1%, 3.6 percentage points higher than a year ago; 19.4% year-to-date, up 0.3 percentage points.

Inventory: GM reconfirmed its inventory target for the end of the year to be “significantly” below last year’s level of about 843,700 vehicles. Days supply at the end of October was 80, or 813,648 vehicles. That compares with 76 days, or 820,741 vehicles, a month ago.

Quote: Kurt McNeil, GM U.S. vice president of sales operations: “We are heading into the fourth quarter with good momentum, thanks to a strong U.S. economy and very strong pickup and crossover sales.”

Did you know? The GMC brand had its highest ATP ever, driven by the success of its Denali subbrand, which reached 30% of retail sales.

October sales dip but strong SAAR predicted

Automaker Oct. 2017 Oct. 2016 Pct. chng.
  BMW of N.A.
    Alfa Romeo 1,205 23 5139.1%
    Chrysler 11,018 14,181 -22.3%
    Dodge 24,476 41,514 -41.0%
    Fiat 1,769 2,622 -32.5%
    Jeep 67,074 68,826 -2.5%
    Ram 47,831 49,443 -3.3%
  FCA US 153,373 176,609 -13.2%
    Maserati 1,140 1,304 -12.6%
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles 154,513 177,913 -13.2%
    Ford 190,789 178,623 6.8%
    Lincoln 8,909 9,069 -1.8%
  Ford Motor Co. 199,698 187,692 6.4%
    Buick 19,142 20,046 -4.5%
    Cadillac 13,931 13,948 -0.1%
    Chevrolet 175,110 181,964 -3.8%
    GMC 44,630 42,668 4.6%
  General Motors 252,813 258,626 -2.2%
    Acura 12,698 12,869 -1.3%
    Honda 114,655 113,292 1.2%
  Honda Motor Co. 127,353 126,161 0.9%
    Genesis 1,786 1,201 48.7%
    Hyundai 51,224 61,304 -16.4%
    Hyundai Motor America 53,010 62,505 -15.2%
    Kia Motors America 44,397 48,977 -9.4%
  Hyundai-Kia 97,407 111,482 -12.6%
    Jaguar 2,891 3,219 -10.2%
    Land Rover 5,477 5,532 -1.0%
  Jaguar Land Rover N.A. 8,368 8,751 -4.4%
  Mazda N.A. 20,811 22,711 -8.4%
  McLaren Automotive 115 58 98.3%
    Mercedes-Benz 31,401 31,383 0.1%
    Smart USA 140 418 -66.5%
  Mercedes-Benz USA 31,541 31,801 -0.8%
  Mitsubishi Motors N.A. 7,381 7,637 -3.4%
    Infiniti 10,296 11,208 -8.1%
    Nissan 112,716 102,312 10.2%
  Nissan North America 123,012 113,520 8.4%
  Nissan/Mitsubishi** 130,393 121,157 7.6%
  Subaru of America 54,045 53,760 0.5%
  Tesla Motors* 4,900 3,400 44.1%
    Lexus 22,894 24,803 -7.7%
    Scion 2 376 -99.5%
    Toyota 165,538 161,116 2.7%
    Toyota/Scion 165,540 161,492 2.5%
  Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. 188,434 186,295 1.1%
  Volvo Car USA 7,008 6,340 10.5%
    Audi 19,425 17,721 9.6%
    Bentley 188 312 -39.7%
    Lamborghini* 88 87 1.1%
    Porsche 4,715 4,506 4.6%
    VW 27,732 24,779 11.9%
  VW Group of America 52,148 47,405 10.0%
Other*** 255 252 1.2%
Total 1,329,802 1,343,804 -1.0%

Numbers in this table are calculated by Automotive News based on actual monthly sales reported by the manufacturers and may differ from numbers reported elsewhere.
Source: Automotive News Data Center
**Renault-Nissan acquired controlling interest in Mitsubishi Motors on Oct. 20, 2016.
***Reflects Aston Martin, Ferrari and Lotus sales.

U.S. sales of the Escape increased 37 percent to 11,036 last month — its best October performance since its launch in 2007, Ford said. Photo credit: DAVID PHILLIPS

U.S. auto sales slipped slightly in October yet the industry is in a position to chalk up its second-strongest selling rate of the year after a robust September.

With all but one automaker reporting, light-vehicle sales declined 1 percent for the month. BMW, citing technical difficulties, has delayed its release until Thursday.

AutoData estimated Wednesday afternoon that the month’s selling rate would be 18.1 million vehicles; General Motors earlier in the day predicted 18 million. A result in that range would be the second-strongest month of the year and much higher than most analysts’ projections. The runner-up so far in 2017 has been February, which saw a rate of 17.5 million.

Previous forecasts from LMC Automotive, Kelley Blue Book and Edmunds saw a 2 percent to 4 percent decline in October. As BMW of North America accounts for just 2 percent of the U.S. market, its results aren’t likely to nudge the preliminary tally by much.

Ford, Nissan, Honda, Volkswagen, Toyota and Subaru posted higher sales tallies. FCA US, General Motors and Hyundai-Kia fell.

The U.S. new-vehicle market, after seven straight annual gains capped by a record 2016, was off 1.7 percent through September.

Here’s how major companies fared in October, followed by forecasts for the



Ford posted a 6.4 percent gain in October sales on stronger truck, crossover and fleet deliveries. Volume rose 6.8 percent at the Ford division but fell 1.8 percent at Lincoln.

Ford said truck sales increased 11 percent and SUV volume rose 5.3 percent, offsetting a 2.4 percent dip in car volume. Retail volume rose 3.5 percent and fleet deliveries rose 15 percent.


GM sales fell 2.2 percent behind a drop of 3.8 percent at Chevrolet. Volume slipped 4.5 percent at Buick and 0.1 percent at Cadillac, but rose 4.6 percent at GMC.

While GM’s truck and crossover sales were strong, car volume skidded 24 percent to 52,800 units last month.


A 19 percent surge in light truck volume — an October high — helped Toyota Motor Corp. post a 1.1 percent gain in volume last month. Deliveries rose 2.5 percent at the Toyota division but slid 7.7 percent at Lexus. Combined car demand at Toyota and Lexus skidded 15 percent.

“The first month of the final quarter of 2017 saw sustained strong sales for the industry, and we expect that momentum to continue through the last two months of the year,” said Jack Hollis, group vice president and general manager of the Toyota division.


Strong truck and crossover demand helped Nissan Motor Co. sales rise 8.4 percent last month to 123,012 — an October record — with a 10 percent gain at the Nissan brand offsetting an 8.1 percent decline at Infiniti.


Lower fleet sales — 23,220 units, down 43 percent in October — continue to undermine overall results at FCA US, which reported a decline of 13 percent. Five of FCA’s six major brands — Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, Ram and Fiat — posted declines.


Strong demand for cars helped counter weaker light-truck volumes at Honda Motor Co., which posted a 0.9 percent overall gain in October volume. Sales rose 1.2 percent at the Honda division but dropped 1.3 percent at Acura. American Honda’s car sales, led by the Honda Civic and redesigned Accord, rose 5.9 percent while light truck demand slid 3.6 percent. All of the Honda brand’s light trucks, except the Pilot, posted declines last month.


Volkswagen sales were up 12 percent to 27,732 on growing sales of its new crossover lineup. Audi extended its industry-best sales streak to eight consecutive years, rising 9.6 percent to 19,425 with strength from its Q5 and Q7 crossovers.


Subaru of America narrowly extended its streak of monthly sales gains to generate its best October ever. Sales in the U.S. were up 0.5 percent to 54,045 vehicles for October. The winning streak is now at 71 months for monthly sales increases.


Hyundai Motor America said its October sales fell 15 percent to 53,010 vehicles, despite a 49 percent boost from the Genesis brand. Elantra sales slipped 7 percent to 14,733 vehicles. The Tucson compact crossover posted an 8 percent gain to 8,731 deliveries. Santa Fe crossover deliveries ramped up 15 percent to 13,024 vehicles.

At Kia, sales dropped 9.4 percent to 44,397 vehicles, paced by a 29 percent fall in Soul sales to 9,254 deliveries. The Forte compact sedan gained 15 percent to 9,219 deliveries. Cadenza sales improved to 1,021 deliveries from 289 during the same month last year.


Analysts polled by Bloomberg had expected the seasonally adjusted sales rate for October to come in at 17.6 million, one of the highest rates of the year, but down from September’s torrid 18.58 million pace and just below October 2016’s 17.85 million rate. A SAAR of 17.5 million or higher would be well above the industry’s sales pace in the first eight months of the year. GM today pegged the October SAAR at 18 million.


Incentives averaged $3,901 per vehicle in the first 17 days of October, J.D. Power says, topping the month’s previous record set last year, by $66. Power says average transaction prices across the industry also set an October record, rising $615 from a year ago to $32,185, suggesting that rising discounts are not putting a dent in profits. For the month, ALG estimates new-vehicle incentives averaged $3,820, up 8.4 percent from October 2016 but down 1.7 percent from September. Among major automakers, GM and Nissan offered the biggest deals last month, ALG says. (See chart below.)


  • Automakers are struggling to move lagging 2017 inventory off dealer lots. In October, 72 percent of new vehicles sold were 2017 models, Edmunds said, while last October, 60 percent of new vehicles sold were 2016 models.
  • There were 25 selling days last month compared with 26 in October 2016.
  • U.S. consumers had four weekends to shop for vehicles last month compared with five in October 2016.
  • Among major automakers, only Fiat Chrysler is still looking for its first monthly sales gain this year. Among major brands, Jeep and Hyundai have yet to post a monthly sales advance.


Kelley Blue Book estimates average transaction prices for light vehicles in the United States came in at $35,263 for October, $101 higher than October 2016 and $128 higher than September 2017.

“Transaction prices continue to rise at a slower pace than we’ve seen recently. Prices in the third quarter were up just 1 percent after averaging 3 percent gains in the first half of the year. While Kelley Blue Book expects solid sales in October 2017 with a 17.9 million SAAR, flat transaction prices combined with ever-growing incentive spending signal headwinds for the new-vehicle market as 2017 nears its end.”

    — Tim Fleming, analyst for Kelley Blue Book

October incentive outlays for U.S.
Manufacturer Oct. 2017 incentive forecast Oct. 2016 Sep. 2017 Percent change vs. Oct. 2016 Percent change vs Sept. 2017
BMW (BMW, Mini) $5,028 $6,472 $5,273 -22% -4.6%
Daimler (Mercedes-Benz, Smart) $4,882 $4,770 $5,002 2.3% -2.4%
FCA (Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Ram, Fiat) $4,631 $4,185 $4,635 10.7% -0.1%
Ford (Ford, Lincoln) $4,443 $4,060 $4,473 9.4% -0.7%
GM (Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC) $5,105 $4,456 $5,215 15% -2.1%
Honda (Acura, Honda) $2,023 $1,899 $1,958 6.5% 3.3%
Hyundai $2,802 $2,467 $2,843 14% -1.4%
Kia $3,915 $3,133 $3,883 25% 0.8%
Nissan (Nissan, Infiniti) $4,428 $4,236 $4,471 4.5% -1%
Subaru $1,084 $1,097 $1,077 -1.2% 0.6%
Toyota (Lexus, Scion, Toyota) $2,684 $2,429 $2,783 10.5% -3.6%
Volkswagen (Audi, Porsche, Volkswagen) $3,597 $3,855 $3,657 -6.7% -1.7%
Industry $3,820 $3,525 $3,885 8.4% -1.7%
Source: ALG

CANADA: Trucks drive October sales gain of 6.3 percent

Trucks and crossovers continued to deliver strong Canadian sales for a number of automakers during October.

Total sales in Canada grew 6.3 percent to 164,214 deliveries, according to the monthly DesRosiers report.

Trucks and utility vehicles drove October sales increases for General Motors Canada and Nissan Canada while F-series trucks proved to be the saving grace for Ford Canada, which saw its sales dip slightly last month.

Meanwhile, the Toyota Camry sedan helped Toyota to a sizeable sales gain in October.

Here’s a look at some of the automakers’ October sales:


GM’s line of trucks and utility vehicles lifted the automaker’s total October sales to 26,847 vehicles, up 26.5 percent compared with the same month last year.

Here’s a comment among the thousands in our Project XX Survey that really hit us.

The automaker sold 22,343 total trucks and crossovers last month, up 43.5 percent from October 2016. At the same time, the automaker’s total car sales were down 20.3 percent, to just 4,504 units.

“Month after month we are seeing success across all our brands, led by our dynamic portfolio of crossovers, mid- and full-sized trucks,” GM Canada Vice-President of Sales John Roth said in a statement.

GMC sales, which include the Sliverado truck, were up 35.4 percent to 8,941 units over the same month last year. Chevrolet, which includes the Silverado pickup and popular Equinox crossover, saw its sales rise 20.9 percent, to 14,371 vehicles.


Ford sales slipped 2 percent to 21,081 in October as consumers fled from the automaker’s cars.

Ford’s total truck sales were up 5.5 percent to 18,881 units, based mainly on the strength of the F series, which posted its best October on record. Ford sold 10,591 F-series trucks, up 25 percent over the same month last year.

Car sales plunged 39 percent to 2,200 units.


Monthly sales for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles fell 12 percent to 17,211 vehicles, according to the DesRosiers Automotive Consultants Inc. Detailed results could not be immediately obtained from FCA on Wednesday.


Nissan Canada posted total Canadian sales of 11,577 vehicles in October, good for an increase of 9.4 percent and its best October ever.

The Nissan brand on its own set an October sales record with 10,493 units sold, an increase of 13.1 percent.

Nissan’s best-selling vehicle in Canada, the Nissan Rogue crossover, had sales of 3,483 units, an October record.

The Murano crossover posted 1,303 vehicles sold, an increase of 35.4 percent and also an October sales record.

The automaker’s luxury Infiniti brand sales totalled 1,084 units, a decrease of 17.1 percent year-over-year.


Toyota also saw its sales rise in October, up 8.9 percent to 19,671 units led by strong Camry, Sienna and RAV4 sales.

In a climate where Canadians are shifting to trucks and crossovers, Camry sales soared 72 per cent to 1,517 units. Toyota sold just 882 Camry sedans last October. The automaker’s total car sales were up 8.3 percent to 6,625 vehicles.

Toyota truck sales were led by its Sienna minivan and RAV4 SUV with their sales up 24.5 and 10.9 percent, respectively.

Toyota also saw sales of its luxury Lexus brand continue to grow, up eight percent.


Hyundai Canada reported a small October sales increase of two percent, to 10,206 vehicles.


The utterly ridiculous Mercedes-Benz G500 4×42 had no business heading to market, but we’re glad it did. Mercedes-Benz announced that production on the model is coming to an end, and if you want one, you have until the end of the month to place an order. Prices start at 231,693 euros.

Inspired by the public’s strong reactions to a similar concept vehicle, Mercedes-Benz introduced the G500 4×42 in December 2015. The model later came to the U.S. market in 2017.

Not only is the vehicle more than 7 feet wide, it’s 7 feet, 9 inches tall and has nearly 18 inches of ground clearance. The model is known for its military-grade portal axles that help it handle extreme off-road adventures, including fording water more than 3 feet deep. Power comes from a twin-turbo 4.0-liter  V-8 engine that makes 422 hp.

Surprisingly, this wasn’t the most bonkers G-Class Mercedes has ever built. How can we forget the G63 AMG 6×6 that rides on three portal axles and weighs over 9,000 pounds?

Mercedes-Benz recently introduced 1:18 scale models of the G500 4×42 apparently as a send-off. Fortunately, there’s still the regular G63 AMG that packs a whopping 563 hp from its twin-turbo 5.5-liter V-8. And there’s the even more powerful G65 AMG producing 621 hp from a twin-turbo 6.0-liter V-12.


Mazda’s rotary engine is coming sooner than expected, but not powering a sports car. Speaking to Automotive News, Mitsuo Hitomi, Mazda’s global powertrain boss, said that the rotary engine will become a range extender for the automaker’s upcoming electric vehicle.

During a technology preview in Japan, Hitomi said to Automotive News that a rotary engine is ideal as a range extender because it’s small, powerful and doesn’t generate much vibration. Mazda’s first EV is expected to hit the market alongside a hybrid in 2019. Akira Kyomen, program manager for vehicle development, revealed that there will be two variants of the EV, pure electric and one with a range extender. Japan, Europe and China will be the key target markets for the pure EV as Mazda believes these type of vehicles can get by with less range. In North America, on the other hand, the range extender is a necessity because consumer have longer daily drives, according to Kyomen. Along with the two-model strategy for its EV, Mazda has developed a new vehicle platform that will also debut in 2019 and it’s been engineered with EV and hybrid powertrains in mid.

Hitomi also revealed that a second, larger, more powerful rotary engine is also under development. This unit is expected to power a high performance sports car in the future that will slot above the Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, Hitomi told Automotive News that the main issue remains making a business case for the vehicle and whether the automaker will be able to sell enough cars.

Originally introduced in the Cosmo Sport, the rotary engine first appeared in a Mazda vehicle in 1967 and powered a number of sports cars including the third-generation RX-7, which featured a 1.3-liter two-rotor unit with sequential twin-turbocharging. Mazda remains the only Japanese automaker to win the 24 Hours of Le Mans and it did it using the rotary-powered 787B race car.


You know which vehicle won our recent Accord vs. Camry comparison test, but now it’s time to take a look at the design differences between the two midsizers. Fresh off redesigns for the 2018 model year, both vehicles now feature bolder sheetmetal, making it clear they are jockeying for sedan buyers’ attention. So which one wins the styling crown?

When it comes to the front end design, the Accord features a structured look dominated by horizontal lines. The grille is flat and consists of rectangular shapes, while the Toyotafeatures a more layered look. Some trim levels of the Camry have silver grille slats that wrap across from one end of the front fascia to the other, while others have a grille dominated by trapezoid and rhombus shapes. Meanwhile, the Honda features fog lights slotted below the headlights, unlike the Toyota. Overall, we’d say the Toyota looks a bit more three dimensional, which perhaps makes it more visually interesting up front. And we might dock a few points from the Honda because of its silver bar that cuts into the top of the headlights, creating a furrowed eyebrow look.

The Accord shares the same overall length as the Camry, except SE and XSE Camrys are longer by just a hair. While you won’t notice any differences in length, the two cars appear quite distinct in shape when examining them from their side profiles. The Toyota appears to have a rounded snout while the Accord’s nose comes down sharply into an almost 90-degree angle. Compared to the Camry, the Accord features more structured character lines that run across the side. One consistent line on top of the doors runs from the hood to the rear, compared to the Camry that has a more fluid line in the same area. Harsh lines run across the lower portion of the doors on the Accord, while the Camry features a softer indentation.

In the rear, the Accord dons the same C-shaped taillights as the Civic. However, the Camry has more typical taillights. Both cars feature small rear decklid spoilers and sculpted rear bumpers. The Toyota gets “Camry” badging between the taillights.

Just like much of the exterior, the Camry features more fluid lines in its interior compared to the Accord. The Camry’s infotainment screen sits on a curved upper center console that melds into the lower area near the cupholders. The dashboard also features swoopy, dramatic lines. Meanwhile, the Accord is once again dominated by boxier shapes. A rectangular infotainment screen sits on top of the dashboard, while the Camry’s screen is embedded in. Both feature 8-inch infotainment screens and 7-inch digital instrument cluster displays.


The United States has proposed more North American parts and steel in cars built under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) during the latest round of negotiation talks with Canada and Mexico.

Reuters cites sources familiar with the talks, who say the mood is bad in the fourth of seven planned discussions regarding NAFTA. The U.S. previously proposed a sunset clause that would see the deal expire in five years. Both Canada and Mexico opposed that idea as well as the latest parts content demand that would require trucks, cars, and large engines to contain 85 percent North American parts content (up from 62.5 percent) and 50 percent U.S.-made parts, according to sources. President Donald Trump has railed against NAFTA since his campaign days, calling it an unfair deal that the U.S. must renegotiate or walk away from. According to Trump administration officials, current content rules don’t do enough to discourage automakers from using parts from China or other low-wage Asian countries.

Future site of Toyota’s plant in Guanajuato, Mexico

In addition to the increased regional parts content, the U.S. wants automakers to ensure North American steel, aluminum, copper, and plastic resins are used. Canada and Mexico say meeting these demands would mean disrupting the North American auto industry. The Trump Administration also hopes to stop vehicle production from leaving the U.S. for Mexico.

Upping regional content requirements would raise costs and would defeat the benefits of NAFTA’s tariff-free arrangement, according to auto industry groups. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce calls the demands “poison pill” proposals that will sink the deal.

Both Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto said they were committed to achieving a “win-win-win” deal. The talks are scheduled to run through October 17, and three more meetings are on the books.